November 20, 2025

The Historical Inevitability of the Mind–Body–Spirit Industry in the Post-AI Era

Chun Xia, Ph.D. TSVC co-founder & General Partner

Abstract

This paper proposes and examines a historical regularity: when technology eliminates a natural form of human activity, markets inevitably generate an “artificial compensatory industry” to meet the biological or psychological needs that persist.
Based on this framework, the emergence of the modern fitness industry and the modern entertainment industry were not accidents or cultural trends, but structural outcomes of the Industrial Revolution and modern media revolutions.

By comparing the historical transition from agricultural to modern societies—specifically the transformations from physical labor → fitness industry, and from ritual life → entertainment industry—this paper develops a Substitution–Compensation Industrial Model.

Using this model, the paper argues that AI’s takeover of cognitive labor will cause humans to lose natural cognitive load and meaning-making processes. This will trigger a third substitution–compensation cycle: the rise of the Mind–Body–Spirit Industry, built around heart-mind labor, psychological resilience, emotional regulation, self-awareness, and meaning construction.

Drawing from exercise physiology, media history, sociology, technological anthropology, and labor philosophy, this paper further projects the likely structure and scale of this emerging industry.

Keywords

Mind–Body–Spirit Industry; Heart-Mind Labor; Fitness Industry; Entertainment Industry; Technological Anthropology; AI Labor Substitution

1. Theoretical Framework:

Technology Substitution and the “Historical Generation Function” of Compensatory Industries**

The core hypothesis of this paper is:

Industrial formation is driven by three forces:
(1) technology eliminates a pre-existing natural human activity;
(2) biological or psychological needs persist;
(3) markets create artificial substitutes to meet these needs.

The interaction of these forces produces new, structured industries.
This can be expressed as the Substitution–Compensation Industrial Model.

2. The Fitness Industry: Physiological Compensation After the Disappearance of Physical Labor

2.1 Technology Eliminated Physical Labor: Structural Shifts of the Industrial Revolution

As historian E. P. Thompson argues, the Industrial Revolution shifted human labor from “task-based rhythms” to “clock-based labor discipline,” while mechanization replaced most forms of physical labor (Thompson, 1967).

Daily life in agrarian societies involved:

  • constant walking,
  • heavy agricultural labor,
  • physically intensive household labor (fetching water, washing, carrying loads).

According to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics historical records, 75% of American workers engaged in physical labor in 1870; this fell below 25% by 1970.

In short, the natural ecological context of physical labor disappeared.

2.2 Physiological Needs Persist: Sedentary Behavior and Civilizational Illness

WHO (2019) reports:

  • 26% of adults suffer from health risks due to insufficient activity.
  • Cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and metabolic syndrome are the leading global causes of death.
  • Sedentary behavior constitutes a primary public health challenge.

Exercise physiology research (Booth et al., Nature, 2012) demonstrates:

“The human body evolved for continuous movement.”

Industrial technology removed the natural context for movement, but the biological need for movement remained.

2.3 Compensation Mechanism: The Explosion of the Fitness Industry

The fitness industry emerged as a structured, artificial replacement for lost physical labor.
Its formation followed clear trajectories:

(1) Gyms and “artificial physical labor spaces”

  • The first commercial gym dates to the 1849 German Turnverein movement.
  • 1950s–70s: U.S. gym chains (e.g., Gold’s Gym) expanded widely.
  • Global fitness market reached USD 1.3 trillion in 2024 (Global Wellness Institute).

(2) Professionalization of Training

Certification systems (NASM, ACE, NSCA) created full career pathways.

(3) Sportswear Industry

Nike, Adidas, and other corporations became hundred-billion-dollar brands—essentially redesigning physical labor as modern fashion and lifestyle.

(4) Wearable Technology

Devices like Apple Watch, WHOOP, and Garmin form a digital feedback infrastructure for artificial exercise.

(5) Health and Functional Food Industry

Fitness growth coincided with the explosion of “healthy eating”:

  • protein supplements,
  • energy bars,
  • meal replacement products (Soylent, Huel),
  • low-sugar and controlled-carb diets,
  • micronutrient supplements.

GWI (2023) places the global healthy eating and nutrition market at USD 1.65 trillion.

2.4 Essence of the Fitness Industry

The fitness industry is not a lifestyle upgrade, but:

a physiological compensation system, created because technology removed natural physical labor.

3. The Entertainment Industry: Cultural Compensation After the Disappearance of Ritual Life

3.1 Technology Disrupted Traditional Rituals

In agrarian civilizations, “spiritual consumption” centered on:

  • religious rituals,
  • communal festivals,
  • oral storytelling,
  • local theater.

These forms were limited by:

  • low literacy,
  • poor reproducibility,
  • time/place dependence,
  • elite control.

Entertainment could not yet become an industry.

3.2 The Rise of Modern Entertainment in the 19th Century

French media historian P. Robert notes that:

“The socialization of modern entertainment began in 1830s Paris.”

A key moment:

1836: The newspaper La Presse invents serialized fiction

  • cheap subscription,
  • media advertising,
  • daily novel serialization.

This marked the commercial birth of mass entertainment (Thérenty & Vaillant, 2001).

In Britain, Charles Dickens’ serialized publication (Hayward, 1997):

  • standardized periodic attention cycles,
  • created the first large-scale mass readership.

3.3 Media Technology as Cultural Compensation

Technological waves (printing, film, radio, television, internet, AIGC) industrialized spiritual stimulation by replacing traditional cultural functions:

TechnologyReplaced traditional functionSerialized pressLongform storytelling ritualsCinemaCollective dramatic experienceRadioOral culture and communal listeningTelevisionFamily ritualsInternetCommunity & identityAIGCPersonalized narrative construction

Thus, the entertainment industry represents:

a cultural compensation system for modernity’s loss of shared spiritual activity.

4. The AI Era: The Disappearance of Cognitive Labor and the Emergence of the “Mental Compensation Industry”

4.1 AI Eliminates Natural Cognitive Load

AI systems are increasingly taking over:

  • memory,
  • reasoning,
  • writing,
  • analysis,
  • creativity,
  • planning,
  • decision-making.

This creates two consequences:

(1) Attention degradation

Information overload and algorithmic stimuli weaken sustained attention (Carr, 2010).

(2) Meaning collapse

Cognitive labor was historically a key source of meaning (Arendt, 1958).

4.2 Psychological and Neuroscientific Evidence

Studies show:

  • lack of cognitive challenge causes cognitive decline (Stern, 2007);
  • emotional regulation requires active training (Gross, 2015);
  • meaning structures require reflection and awareness (Steger, 2012).

Thus:

The human mind must “stay active” or it degenerates.
The stronger AI becomes, the more fragile humans become.

4.3 The Mind–Body–Spirit Industry as “Socialized Mental Compensation”

To compensate for the disappearance of natural cognitive labor, society will build structured substitutes:

Cognitive FunctionCompensatory Industry ModuleAttentionfocus-training apps; breathwork systemsEmotional balancecoaching; mindfulness; therapy-adjacent modalitiesStress recoverymeditation spaces; “heart-mind gyms”Meaning-makingspiritual growth courses; philosophical counselingSelf-awarenessAI mental assistants; life-logging systemsSocial connectionrelational workshops; group processes

This mirrors the fitness industry:

AI eliminates cognitive labor → markets construct “heart-mind labor spaces.”

5. Industry Forecast: Structure and Scale of the Mind–Body–Spirit Economy

5.1 Market Size Projection (2035)

Based on growth rates in:

  • global mental health (12.8% CAGR),
  • health & wellness economy (USD 6.3 trillion),
  • wearables (>10% CAGR),
  • AI mental assistants penetration,

we project:

By 2035, the Mind–Body–Spirit economy will reach USD 3.5–5 trillion,
equivalent to the combined scale of the global fitness + entertainment industries.

5.2 Industry Structure: Five Major Segments

(1) Heart-Mind Training

  • attention training,
  • emotional resilience,
  • purpose-building,
  • heart-mind fitness studios.

(2) Neuro-Wellness Technology

  • HRV/EEG sensors,
  • AI mind assistants,
  • sleep/emotion monitoring.

(3) Healthy Eating (Functional Nutrition)

  • clean eating,
  • meal replacements,
  • high-protein diets,
  • mood foods,
  • gut–brain supplements.

(4) Meaning & Growth Education

  • emotional literacy,
  • relationship intelligence,
  • personal growth curricula.

(5) Spaces for Inner Work

  • meditation pods,
  • inner gyms,
  • retreat communities,
  • wellness architecture.

6. Conclusion:

Structural Forces Make the Mind–Body–Spirit Industry Historically Inevitable**

The fitness industry teaches us:

Technology substituted physical labor → fitness became physiological compensation.

The entertainment industry teaches us:

Technology substituted ritual life → media became cultural compensation.

The AI era teaches us:

Technology substitutes cognitive labor → the Mind–Body–Spirit industry will become mental compensation.

This emergence is not a cultural trend, nor a commercial gimmick.
It is the next structural infrastructure of human civilization.

The Mind–Body–Spirit industry will form the spiritual and psychological foundation of the Post-AI era.

References (Selected)

Booth, F. W., et al. (2012). Lack of exercise is harmful to health. Nature.
Thompson, E. P. (1967). Time, Work-Discipline & Industrial Capitalism.
Global Wellness Institute (2024). Global Wellness Economy Monitor.
Thérenty, M., & Vaillant, A. (2001). La Civilisation du Journal.
Hayward, J. (1997). Dickens and the Media.
Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows.
Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition.
Steger, M. (2012). Meaning in Life.
WHO (2019). Physical Activity Fact Sheet.

Read the original article